Review of the Research Progress on Periodisation Design and Neuromuscular Adaptation of Strength Training in Adolescent Athletes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18063/apm.v10i2.875Keywords:
Periodisation design, Neuromuscular adaptation, Strength training, Adolescent athletesAbstract
This article reviews the current state of the art in the phased design and neuromuscular adaptation of strength training for adolescent athletes. It discusses the importance of periodic models, their impact on strength development, and the mechanisms of neuromuscular adaptation during training. This study focuses on how models of periodism, including linear, fluctuation, and block periodism, can help optimize neuromuscular efficiency and explore their specific roles in the development of motor unit synchronization, HTMU recruitment, and myofiber hypertrophy in adolescents.
References
Bompa T, Buzzichelli C, 2019, Periodization: Theory and Methodology of Training. Human Kinetics, Illinois.
Issurin V, 2008, Block Periodization Versus Traditional Training Theory: A Review. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 48(1): 65.
Williams T, Tolusso D, Fedewa M, et al., 2017, Comparison of Periodized and Non-Periodized Resistance Training on Maximal Strength: A Meta-Analysis. Sports Medicine, 47: 2083–2100.
Lloyd R, Faigenbaum A, Stone M, et al., 2014, Position Statement on Youth Resistance Training: The 2014 International Consensus. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(7): 498–505.
Myer G, Ford K, Hewett T, 2005, The Effects of Gender on Quadriceps Muscle Activation Strategies During a Maneuver That Mimics a High ACL Injury Risk Position. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 15(2): 181–189.
Granacher U, Goesele A, Roggo K, et al., 2011, Effects and Mechanisms of Strength Training in Children. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 32(5): 357–364.
Kraemer W, Ratamess N, 2005, Hormonal Responses and Adaptations to Resistance Exercise and Training. Sports Medicine, 35: 339–361.
Behm D, Faigenbaum A, Falk B, et al., 2008, Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology Position Paper: Resistance Training in Children and Adolescents. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 33(3): 547–561.
Kubo K, Kanehisa H, Fukunaga T, 2002, Effects of Resistance and Stretching Training Programmes on the Viscoelastic Properties of Human Tendon Structures in Vivo. The Journal of Physiology, 538(1): 219–226.
Aagaard P, Simonsen E, Andersen J, et al., 2000, Neural Inhibition During Maximal Eccentric and Concentric Quadriceps Contraction: Effects of Resistance Training. Journal of Applied Physiology, 89(6): 2249–2257.
Duchateau J, Baudry S, 2014, The Neural Control of Coactivation During Fatiguing Contractions Revisited. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 24(6): 780–788.
Häkkinen K, Alén M, Kraemer W, et al., 2003, Neuromuscular Adaptations During Concurrent Strength and Endurance Training Versus Strength Training. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 89: 42–52.
Schoenfeld B, Ogborn D, Krieger J, 2017, Dose-Response Relationship Between Weekly Resistance Training Volume and Increases in Muscle Mass: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 35(11): 1073–1082.
Issurin V, 2008, Block Periodization Versus Traditional Training Theory: A Review. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 48(1): 65.
Tesch P, Dudley G, Duvoisin M, et al., 1990, Force and EMG Signal Patterns During Repeated Bouts of Concentric or Eccentric Muscle Actions. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 138(3): 263–271.
