Current Application Status and Insights of the Ecology of Medical Care Model in Health Services Research: A Scoping Review

Authors

    Zhengyan Zhang, Zhenzhong Wang, Ji Zhang, Enying Gong, Ruitai Shao School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China

Keywords:

Ecology of medical care model, Health services needs and demand, Resource allocation, Health inequities, Population medicine, Scoping review

Abstract

Background: Over the past decade, the ecology of medical care model has gained significant attention from scholars due to its prominent application value. Variations and shifts in the theoretical modeling constructs of this model can serve as indicators of the transformation in healthcare delivery, offering insights into the health needs of the population and the utilization of health services in China. Objective: This study aims to integrate and compare research utilizing the ecology of medical care model, describe the current status of such research, and contrast research methodologies and key findings. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in June 2022 using PubMed, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Embase, China Biomedical Literature Service System, CNKI, and Wanfang databases. The search covered the period from 1961 to 2022 and was not limited by language. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology manual for scoping review guided the literature screening, information extraction, and descriptive analysis. Results: A total of 28 articles met the inclusion criteria, with 22 (78.6%) published after 2010. Most studies employing the ecology of medical care model focused on population health needs, healthcare resource utilization patterns, healthcare-seeking behavior, and disease referrals. Regarding the study population, 11 articles (39.3%) encompassed all age groups, while seven studies (25.0%) targeted specific populations. Four studies were conducted in urban areas of China. Compared to developed countries (regions), developing countries (regions) showed less emphasis on self-seeking help by patients (e.g., over-the-counter medicines, massages). Available ecological models indicated lower rates of patient self-reporting of health issues (symptoms) but higher rates of hospital outpatient and emergency room visits in developing countries (regions). Conclusion: The ecology of medical care model and its research methods have undergone significant evolution in the last two decades, maintaining their value as tools for researchers and policymakers to understand healthcare demand and the dynamics between healthcare resource supply and demand. Currently, the application of this model is limited in China, highlighting the need for future studies to utilize it to expose health inequities and unmet health needs in the country. Such research in the field of population medicine will provide evidence to enhance the rational allocation of health resources among the Chinese population.

References

White KL, Williams TF, Greenberg BG, 1961, The Ecology of Medical Care. N Engl J Med, 265: 885–892.

Horder J, Horder E, 1954, Illness in General Practice. Practitioner, 1954(173): 177–187.

GBD 2019 Human Resources for Health Collaborators, 2022, Measuring the Availability of Human Resources for Health and Its Relationship to Universal Health Coverage for 204 Countries and Territories from 1990 to 2019: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet, 399(10341): 2129–2154.

Green LA, Fryer GE Jr, Yawn BP, et al., 2001, The Ecology of Medical Care Revisited. N Engl J Med, 344(26): 2021–2025.

Dovey S, Weitzman M, Fryer G, et al., 2003, The Ecology of Medical Care for Children in the United States. Pediatrics, 111(5 pt 1): 1024–1029.

Leung GM, Wong IOL, Chan WS, et al., 2005, The Ecology of Health Care in Hong Kong. Soc Sci Med, 61(3): 577–590.

Fukui T, Rhaman M, Takahashi O, et al., 2005, The Ecology of Medical Care in Japan. Japan Medical Association Journal, 48(4): 163–167.

Yawn BP, Fryer GE, Phillips RL, et al., 2005, Using the Ecology Model to Describe the Impact of Asthma on Patterns of Health Care. BMC Pulm Med, 5: 7.

Shao CC, Chang CP, Chou LF, et al., 2011, The Ecology of Medical Care in Taiwan. J Chin Med Assoc, 74(9): 408–412.

Ferro A, Kristiansson PMD, 2011, Ecology of Medical Care in a Publicly Funded Health Care System: A Registry Study in Sweden. Scand J Prim Health Care, 29(3): 187–192.

Tokunaga S, Sameshima H, Ikenoue T, 2011, Applying the Ecology Model to Perinatal Medicine: From a Regional Population-Based Study. J Pregnancy, 2011: 587390.

Roncoletta A, Gusso GD, Bensenor IM, et al., 2012, A Reappraisal in São Paulo, Brazil (2008) of the Ecology of Medical Care: The One Per Thousand’s Rule. Fam Med, 44(4): 247–251.

Hansen AH, Halvorsen PA, Forde OH, 2012, The Ecology of Medical Care in Norway: Wide Use of General Practitioners May Not Necessarily Keep Patients Out of Hospitals. J Public Health Res, 1(2): 177–183.

Shao S, Zhao FF, Wang J, et al., 2013, The Ecology of Medical Care in Beijing. PLoS One, 8(12): e82446.

Vo TL, Duchesnes C, Vögeli O, et al., 2015, The Ecology of Health Care in a Belgian Area. Acta Clin Belg, 70(4): 280–286.

Chang CP, Chou CL, Chou YC, et al., 2014, The Ecology of Gynecological Care for Women. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 11(8): 7669–7677.

Stewart M, Ryan B, 2015, Ecology of Health Care in Canada. Can Fam Physician, 61(5): 449–453.

Gordon B, Levy Y, Yemini T, et al., 2016, The Ecology of Medical Care Among Israeli Military Aviators. Aerosp Med Hum Perform, 87(12): 1036–1040.

Pimlott N, Katz A, 2016, Ecology of Family Physicians’ Research Engagement. Can Fam Physician, 62(5): 385–390.

Kim YS, Choi YJ, 2016, The Ecology of Medical Care in Korea. J Korean Med Sci, 31(11): 1684–1688.

Kaneko M, Matsushima M, Irving G, 2017, The Ecology of Medical Care on an Isolated Island in Okinawa, Japan: A Retrospective Open Cohort Study. BMC Health Serv Res, 17(1): 37.

Fukui T, Rahman M, Ohde S, et al., 2017, Reassessing the Ecology of Medical Care in Japan. J Community Health, 42(5): 935–941.

Namiki H, Kobayashi T, 2018, The Ecology of Medical Care on the Westernmost Remote Island, Yonaguni Island, Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS One, 13(6): e0199871.

Johansen ME, Richardson CR, 2019, The Ecology of Medical Care Before and After the Affordable Care Act: Trends from 2002 to 2016. Ann Fam Med, 17(6): 526–537.

Hoffmann K, Ristl R, George A, et al., 2019, The Ecology of Medical Care: Access Points to the Health Care System in Austria and Other Developed Countries. Scand J Prim Health Care, 37(4): 409–417.

McAlister FA, Tonelli M, Wiebe N, et al., 2020, The Ecology of Medical Care for Adults in Alberta, 2002/03 to 2016/17: A Retrospective Cohort Study. CMAJ Open, 8(1): e169–177.

Giezendanner S, Bretschneider W, Fischer R, et al., 2020, The Ecology of Medical Care in Switzerland: Prevalence of Illness in the Community and Healthcare Utilisation in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly, 150: w20221.

Xiong XC, Cao XL, Luo L, 2021, The Ecology of Medical Care in Shanghai. BMC Health Serv Res, 21(1): 51.

Aoki T, Matsushima M, 2022, The Ecology of Medical Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan: A Nationwide Survey. J Gen Intern Med, 37(5): 1211–1217.

Kaneko M, Shimizu S, Kuroki M, et al., 2022, Ecology of Medical Care for 90+ Individuals: An Exhaustive Cross-Sectional Survey in an Ageing City. Geriatr Gerontol Int, 22(6): 483–489.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-16