Research Progress of Computer Simulation in Fracture Healing
Keywords:
Computer simulation, Fracture healing, ModelAbstract
Fracture healing represents an intricate biological process. Across various time periods, numerous factors influence this healing journey, primarily categorized into mechanical and biological stimulation factors. To enhance our understanding and simulation of fracture healing, multiple computer models have emerged, including mechanical stimulation models, biological stimulation models, integrated mechanical-biological stimulation models, and evolving multi-scale models. However, each computer model bears certain limitations in clinical application. This paper comprehensively reviews the stimulating factors and developed computer models associated with fracture healing, highlighting existing challenges. Our aim is to offer valuable insights for the clinical application of computer simulations in fracture healing.
References
Borgiani E, Duda GN, Checa S, 2017, Multiscale Modeling of Bone Healing: Toward a Systems Biology Approach. Front Physiol, 8: 287.
Windolf M, Ernst M, Schwyn R, et al., 2021, The Relation Between Fracture Activity and Bone Healing with Special Reference to the Early Healing Phase—A Preclinical Study. Injury, 51(1): 71–77.
Glatt V, Evans CH, Stoddart MJ, 2019, Regenerative Rehabilitation: The Role of Mechanotransduction in Orthopaedic Regenerative Medicine. J Orthop Res, 37(6): 1263–1269.
Ghimire S, Miramini S, Richardson M, et al., 2018, Role of Dynamic Loading on the Early Stage of Bone Fracture Healing. Ann Biomed Eng, 46(11): 1768–1784.
Iobst CA, Milne E, Khoury A, et al., 2020, A Novel Way to Dynamize a Spatial Frame and Optimize Fracture Healing. Injury, 2020: 9067.
Chen TH, Weber FE, Malina-Altzinger J, et al., 2019, Epigenetic Drugs as a New Therapy for Tumor Necrosis Factor-Compromised Bone Healing. Bone, 127: 49–58.
Jann J, Gascon S, Roux S, et al., 2020, Influence of the TGF-β Superfamily on Osteoclasts/Osteoblasts Balance in Physiological and Pathological Bone Conditions. Int J Mol Sci, 21(20): 7597.
Dumic-Cule I, Peric M, Kucko L, et al., 2018, Bone Morphogenetic Proteins in Fracture Repair. Int Orthop, 42: 2619–2626.
Pacifici R, 2020, Role of Gut Microbiota in the Skeletal Response to PTH. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 106(3): 636–645.
Charoenlarp P, Rajendran AK, Iseki S, 2017, Role of Fibroblast Growth Factors in Bone Regeneration. Inflamm Regen, 37: 10.
Cui YC, Qiu YS, Wu Q, et al., 2020, Hypoxic-Mediated Oxidative Stress Condition and Hydroxyapatite-Inducing Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Mathematical Modeling Study. J Biomed Nanotechnol, 16(6): 910–921.
Pauwels F, 1960, A New Theory on the Influence of Mechanical Stimuli on the Differentiation of Supporting Tissue. The Tenth Contribution to the Functional Anatomy and Causal Morphology of the Supporting Structure. Z Anat Entwicklungsgesch, 121: 478–515.
Perren SM, Cordey J, 1977, Tissue Differences in Fracture Healing. Unfallheilkunde, 80(5): 161–164.
Carter DR, Beaupré GS, Giori NJ, et al., 1998, Mechanobiology of Skeletal Regeneration. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998: S41–S55.
Claes LE, Heigele CA, 1999, Magnitudes of Local Stress and Strain Along Bony Surfaces Predict the Course and Type of Fracture Healing. J Biomech, 32(3): 255–266.
Morgan EF, Salisbury Palomares KT, Gleason RE, et al., 2010, Correlations Between Local Strains and Tissue Phenotypes in an Experimental Model of Skeletal Healing. J Biomech, 43(12): 2418–2424.
Prendergast PJ, Huiskes R, Søballe K, 1997, ESB Research Award 1996. Biophysical Stimuli on Cells During Tissue Differentiation at Implant Interfaces. J Biomech, 30(6): 539–548.
Epari DR, Taylor WR, Heller MO, et al., 2006, Mechanical Conditions in the Initial Phase of Bone Healing. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 21(6): 646–655.
Isaksson H, van Donkelaar CC, Huiskes R, et al., 2008, Determining the Most Important Cellular Characteristics for Fracture Healing Using Design of Experiments Methods. J Theor Biol, 255(1): 26–39.
Steiner M, Claes L, Ignatius A, et al., 2013, Prediction of Fracture Healing Under Axial Loading, Shear Loading and Bending is Possible Using Distortional and Dilatational Strains as Determining Mechanical Stimuli. J R Soc Interface, 10(86): 20130389.
Ament C, Hofer EP, 2000, A Fuzzy Logic Model of Fracture Healing. J Biomech, 33(8): 961–968.
Shefelbine SJ, Augat P, Claes L, et al., 2005, Trabecular Bone Fracture Healing Simulation with Finite Element Analysis and Fuzzy Logic. J Biomech, 38(12): 2440–2450.
Isaksson H, van Donkelaar CC, Huiskes R, et al., 2008, A Mechano-Regulatory Bone-Healing Model Incorporating Cell-Phenotype Specific Activity. J Theor Biol, 252(2): 230–246.
Wang M, Yang N, 2018, Three-Dimensional Computational Model Simulating the Fracture Healing Process with Both Biphasic Poroelastic Finite Element Analysis and Fuzzy Logic Control. Sci Rep, 8(1): 6744.
Isaksson H, Comas O, van Donkelaar CC, et al., 2007, Bone Regeneration During Distraction Osteogenesis: Mechano-Regulation by Shear Strain and Fluid Velocity. J Biomech, 40(9): 2002–2011.
García-Aznar JM, Kuiper JH, Gómez-Benito MJ, et al., 2007, Computational Simulation of Fracture Healing: Influence of Interfragmentary Movement on the Callus Growth. J Biomech, 40(7): 1467–1476.
Bailón-Plaza A, van der Meulen MC, 2001, A Mathematical Framework to Study the Effects of Growth Factor Influences on Fracture Healing. J Theor Biol, 212(2): 191–209.
Geris L, Gerisch A, Sloten JV, et al., 2008, Angiogenesis in Bone Fracture Healing: A Bioregulatory Model. J Theor Biol, 251(1): 137–158.
Peiffer V, Gerisch A, Vandepitte D, et al., 2011, A Hybrid Bioregulatory Model of Angiogenesis During Bone Fracture Healing. Biomech Model Mechanobiol, 10(3): 383–395.
Carlier A, Geris L, Bentley K, et al., 2012, MOSAIC: A Multiscale Model of Osteogenesis and Sprouting Angiogenesis with Lateral Inhibition of Endothelial Cells. PLoS Comput Biol, 8(10): e1002724.
Kühn C, Checa S, 2019, Computational Modeling to Quantify the Contributions of VEGFR1, VEGFR2, and Lateral Inhibition in Sprouting Angiogenesis. Front Physiol, 10: 288.
Lacroix D, Prendergast PJ, 2002, A Mechano-Regulation Model for Tissue Differentiation During Fracture Healing: Analysis of Gap Size and Loading. J Biomech, 35(9): 1163–1171.
Kelly DJ, Prendergast PJ, 2005, Mechano-Regulation of Stem Cell Differentiation and Tissue Regeneration in Osteochondral Defects. J Biomech, 38(7): 1413–1422.
Pérez MA, Prendergast PJ, 2007, Random-Walk Models of Cell Dispersion Included in Mechanobiological Simulations of Tissue Differentiation. J Biomech, 40(10): 2244–2253.
Byrne DP, Lacroix D, Prendergast PJ, 2011, Simulation of Fracture Healing in the Tibia: Mechanoregulation of Cell Activity Using a Lattice Modeling Approach. J Orthop Res, 29(10): 1496–1503.
Checa S, Prendergast PJ, 2009, A Mechanobiological Model for Tissue Differentiation that Includes Angiogenesis: A Lattice-Based Modeling Approach. Ann Biomed Eng, 37(1): 129–145.
Paul GR, Malhotra A, Müller R, 2018, Mechanical Stimuli in the Local In Vivo Environment in Bone: Computational Approaches Linking Organ-Scale Loads to Cellular Signals. Curr Osteoporos Rep, 16(4): 395–403.
Alonso MG, Bertolino G, Yawny A, 2020, Mechanobiological-Based Long Bone Growth Model for the Design of Limb Deformities Correction Devices. J Biomech, 109: 109905.
Perier-Metz C, Duda GN, Checa S, 2020, Mechano-Biological Computer Model of Scaffold-Supported Bone Regeneration: Effect of Bone Graft and Scaffold Structure on Large Bone Defect Tissue Patterning. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 8: 585799.
Hendrikson WJ, van Blitterswijk CA, Rouwkema J, et al., 2017, The Use of Finite Element Analyses to Design and Fabricate Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Skeletal Tissue Engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 5: 30.