Endowing Modern Technology with a Traditional Soul: The Chinese Philosophical Implications in the Logo of ChatGPT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18063/lne.v3i3.819Keywords:
ChatGPT, Endless vitality, Chinese philosophy, Cross-cultural design, Semiotics, Technology and traditionAbstract
This paper explores the traditional Chinese philosophical thoughts integrated into the logo design of ChatGPT, highlighting its interpretation and embodiment in the modern technological field. As a representative of advanced artificial intelligence, the ChatGPT logo is not only a trademark but also carries profound cultural and philosophical connotations. The research, through the analysis of the logo, reveals its alignment with the ancient Chinese concept of “endless vitality.” This paper introduces the functions and design concept of ChatGPT, delves deeply into the ingenious presentation of the “endless vitality” concept in logo design, and showcases the harmonious integration of Eastern philosophy and Western technology. Through comparative analysis, the mutual influence between modern technology and traditional cultural symbols has been highlighted, enhancing the aesthetic value and cultural connotation of the logo. The research also explored the significance of this design in promoting cultural exchange and understanding in the context of global technological development. Finally, the cultural integration marked by ChatGPT was summarized, and the future trends of technology and traditional culture were prospected, providing a valuable case for cross-cultural design.
References
Xi J, Yuan X, 2024, Resonance Across Time and Space: The Philosophical Fit between China’s Fine Traditional Culture and Quantum Theory. Hubei Social Sciences, (12): 15–22.
Chen J, 2025, The Structure, Characteristics and Construction of the Autonomous Knowledge System of Chinese Philosophy and Social Sciences. Public Governance Research, OnlineFirst, 1–5.
Yang L, Liu Y, 2025, The Connotation, Essence and Cultivation Approach of the Spirit of Chinese Educators from the Perspective of Cultural Philosophy. Journal of Guangxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 61(02): 75–86.
Wu S, 2024, Research on the Integration of China’s Fine Traditional Culture and Marxist Philosophy. Popular Literature and Art, (21): 92–94.
Yan S, 2025, Philosophical Reflections on Grasping “Mutual Fit”—“The Second Combination” in the Unity of Commonality and Individuality. Journal of Xinyang Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 45(01): 7–13.
Su Y, 2024, Philosophical Reflections on the Fit between Marxism and China’s Fine Traditional Culture. Dalian Cadre Academic Journal, 40(10): 26–32.
Chao L, 2024, The Practical Philosophy Contained in China’s Fine Traditional Culture. Encyclopedia Knowledge, (27): 15–16.
Kong D, 2024, The Cultural Spirit, Philosophical Background and Historical Origin of Peace in Chinese Civilization. History of Chinese Philosophy, (05): 5–10 + 19.
Fu F, 2024, An Investigation into the Inclusive Cultural Philosophy of Chinese Civilization. Zhejiang Social Sciences, (09): 101–107 + 159.
Zou G, Fang L, 2024, The Philosophical Connotation and Consolidation Path of the Subjectivity of Chinese Culture. Journal of Beihang University (Social Sciences Edition), 37(04): 18–25.
Shao F, Li K, 2024, Philosophical Reflection and Contemporary Development of the Subjectivity of Chinese National Culture. Journal of Wenzhou University (Social Sciences Edition), 37(04): 1–9.
Zou G, 2024, The “Philosophical Self” that Condenses the Cultural Life of the Chinese Nation. Theoretical Exploration, (04): 100–106.
Zhang K, 2024, Philosophical Reflections on the Integration of the Basic Principles of Marxism with China’s Fine Traditional Culture. Journal of Luoyang Normal University, 43(06): 7–10 + 26.
An B, 2024, The Modernization Transformation of Traditional Chinese Culture from the Perspective of Marxist Philosophy, dissertation, Heilongjiang University.
Chen X, 2024, The Cultural and Philosophical Origin of the Chinese and Western Community View and Its Contemporary Implications. Ethnic Studies, (03): 1–14 + 143.
